CSI Dixie: The View from the South's County Coroners' Offices, 1840-1880

05/13/09 08:01:26 am, by Stephen Berry

Coroners’ inquests are some of the richest records we have of life and death in the Old South. In some cases, the inquest is pro forma. A jury is called and concludes that the person lying before them died “at the hands of a person or persons unknown.” But in many cases the record is far richer. The antebellum coroner was not a homicide detective or a medical examiner – he was both ("Quincy” meets “Columbo"). He inspected the body and (possible crime) scene, rounded up witnesses, heard testimony, and made a recommendation. If there was cause, he would seek an arrest warrant. Far more than the sheriff, he was familiar with the strange intimacies inherent in the varied ways people go out of the world.

Examining the coroner’s inquests for several S.C. counties between 1800 and 1860, I discovered evidence that would support studies of antebellum abortion, child abuse, spousal abuse, master-slave murder, and slave on slave violence. To be sure, one gets glimpses of these same things in more traditional court records. But especially in the Old South, cases like these had a way of not quite percolating up through the court system. (And this says nothing of cases in which nothing “actionable” occurred – cases of suicide, accidental death, or “act of God.")

Equally interesting was what happens when I pressed forward into the war years. It was as if Death had gone on holiday. Death goes where men go; between 1861 and 1865, it held high revel – in men’s camps and on their battlefields; it had slipped its bureaucratic leash. But what happened to the coroners who remained at home? Had dying, even on the homefront, changed? And when was Death “re-leashed"?

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Megan Kate Nelson [Visitor] Email
This is such a great way to examine death and dying during the war, Stephen. It is easy to forget that people kept dying at home at "normal" rates while so many men were off dying on battlefields and in hospitals; are you actually finding that the rituals of and responses to home front deaths were affected by this new and overwhelming scale of wartime mortality?

As for the battlefield, I have always wondered if the "carnival of death" during the war opened up opportunities for sociopaths and others to kill or abuse (as in the antebellum cases you mentioned) with impunity; have you found any cases of coroners called to front to determine causes of death in cases deemed to be "unusual"?
PermalinkPermalink 05/17/09 @ 07:29
Comment from: Stephen Berry [Visitor] Email
Hey Megan. Thanks for the vote of confidence! Honestly, I'm at the front end of this project -- I've got a ton of undigested notes, but I'm still thinking about how to make sense of them. To answer your first question, yes, I think I'll be able to show that death had changed at home too. (I'm particularly interested in how the relationship between death and, for lack of a better term, the state, had changed.) This is why I think your second thought/question is particularly interesting. I hadn't thought to investigate "death under suspicious circumstances" at the "front" -- but that strikes me as a *very* fruitful line of research.
PermalinkPermalink 05/18/09 @ 15:27
Comment from: Ken Noe [Visitor] Email
Not that you need more work, but I've often wondered about these statistics after the war. Did hard outdoor living, camp diseases, and bad camp food and water shorten ex-Confederates life expectancies? Was there an increase of family violence? Were guns more often used? I think you have a great window here through which to look and answer some of those questions as well.
PermalinkPermalink 05/19/09 @ 06:09
Comment from: mike degruccio [Visitor] Email
Steve--
Even with the boom in CW death studies, this topic seems subversive and I hope illuminating. I take it that you suspect there were changing relationships between citizens (alive, dying and dead) and the state that can be found within the quotidian records of home front coronary reports.... I'm wondering if you will be able to complicate or add to Gilpin Faust's recent work. And I know you are just beginning to hack away at the records, but I am curious how the military death tolls would affect the procedures and judgments of a Carolinian coroner in substantive ways. Did civilian death lose its sting? It's meaning (or the ways folks casted about for meaning?). Are there any personal letters, writing from coroners that would show how war deaths changed the meaning of civilian death?
I know this is off the path you are looking to blaze, but how did certain soldiers conceive of, or deal with, "ordinary" death? If I remember right, it was James Garfield who-- after witnessing various slaughters in the war--came home and soon witnessed the death of his dearly missed young daughter. The death of his daughter, as I recall, pushed him to the edge; he wrote his wife that he wanted to return back to war where the insanity of death at least made some sense- provided by (I suppose) the state rituals, poetry and speeches that gave the war and its casualties some grand raison d'etre.
PermalinkPermalink 05/21/09 @ 11:19
Comment from: Stephen Berry [Visitor] Email
Ken & Mike: Thanks guys; these are such great suggestions, leads, and questions! Ken, I agree, there are some post-war issues that these coroner's reports might help illuminate. Ironically, for instance, the coroner had sometimes investigated slave deaths (because the state had an interest) but as near as I can tell he often looked the other way on lynchings. Your points about guns, violence, and life-expectancies are well-taken -- I'll definitely follow-up.

And, Mike, yes, I'm very interested in the changing relationship between death and the state -- the general bureaucratization of death as we move into the twentieth century. But I'm also interested in the kinds of cases you describe with Garfield. Certainly Faust is right that the armies and the government bureaucracies had a tall order in dealing with an unprecedented number of corpses and their consequences. But I'm interested in how all this affects death at home. How all these emotions and griefs interact, get conflated, perhaps amplify each other; or, alternately, how individuals sought to make distinctions between them. And I do think/hope I can offer a complicating perspective to Faust.
PermalinkPermalink 05/25/09 @ 12:07
Comment from: Term Papers [Visitor] Email · http://www.flashpapers.com
I gotta hand it to whoever wrote this, you've really kept me updated! Now, let's just hope that I can come across another blog just as interesting :)

PermalinkPermalink 12/16/09 @ 03:50

This post has 5 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))


February 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            

Weirding the War

A creative discussion for those researching and writing on the American Civil War.

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is this?

powered by b2evolution free blog software