The Arrest and Court Martial of Capt. George Dobson

05/03/09 10:46:36 pm, by Ken Noe

On September 14, 1862, Confederate Brig. Gen. James Chalmers, commanding a brigade in Braxton Bragg’s Army of the Mississippi, launched an ill-advised, spur-of-the-moment assault on the Federal works at Munfordville, Kentucky. Expecting an easy victory, Chalmers sent several waves of attackers against formidable Union fortifications before falling back with heavy casualties. Among them was the Scottish-born Col. Robert A. Smith of the 10th Mississippi, a son of the founder of the Smith & Wellstood stove manufacturing concern. When Smith fell mortally wounded, his close friend and brother-in-law, Capt. George Dobson of Company D, abandoned his shattered men in order to help carry him to the rear. Dobson remained at the makeshift field hospital throughout the rest of the day tending to Smith. Union soldiers captured him there. Paroled after the battle, Dobson did not report his predicament at headquarters. Indeed he disappeared from the ranks in order to return Smith’s body to Mississippi. He only returned to his regiment in late December, later stating that he assumed that he must have been exchanged by then. A month passed before the 10th Mississippi’s acting commander, J. H. Walker, suddenly had Dobson arrested, charging him with absence without leave and allowing himself to be captured. Dobson himself proclaimed that he not only had acted correctly and honorably by helping his kinsman, but also had remained at the hospital only because the regimental surgeon ordered him to do so. He also felt a moral obligation to remain away from the army until exchanged. The charges, he insisted, were merely an attempt by Walker to deflect allegations of cowardice during the Battle of Murfreesboro. The case against Dobson, seemingly tight on the surface despite his defense, soon fell apart. Despite his reputation for severity, Bragg himself came to Dobson’s defense, ordering the captain’s release from arrest because he had acted under “proper motives.” When the trial finally took place, no witness would testify against Dobson, and the charges were dropped. It was Walker, not Dobson, who paid for the episode, resigning his command.

This paper will relate the events of Dobson’s capture, arrest, and trial while seeking to understand why Dobson acted as he did, and why a famously harsh commander such as Bragg, as well as the rank and file of the 10th Mississippi, supported the captain’s apparent dereliction of duty and desertion. The army punished enlisted men for abandoning the battlefield and shot them for going home. Why not Dobson? The paper will also discuss how post-war chroniclers explained away or completely erased the episode as part of a larger campaign, led in part by Dobson, to memorialize Colonel Smith, a family-based effort that not only placed a marker in Smith’s native Scotland, but also erected what is still today the only monument at the Munfordville battlefield.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Stephen Berry [Visitor] Email
I wonder how often this sort of thing went on. Paroled after Vicksburg, David Todd of the 22d Louisiana wandered off to his favorite hotel in Richmond, where he overindulged in his usual ways and seemed in no hurry to return. Absent without leave through November and December of 1863, he seems to have paid no price whatever for his conduct -- and he didn't even have Dobson's excuse.

The Dobson case, however, is perfect for getting at questions of camp as community. To be sure, camp is a military jurisdiction; but it is also in essence a town, threaded through with kinship claims, class distinctions, and community standards that provide the matrix in which that military jurisdiction must be exercised.
PermalinkPermalink 05/04/09 @ 07:07
Comment from: AndySlap [Visitor] Email
Ken,

I will be interested to hear about the differences between Dobson's case and that of enlisted soldiers. My first year in East Tennessee I used _The Personal Recollections of General Edward Porter Alexander_ and the students were amazed how he would disappear for months at a time to take care of things at home while his soldiers had no such option. By the end of the reading my Southern students--to the degree that East Tennessee is in the South--hated Alexander. They disliked the class privilege.

I am also curious how well Dobson's explanation that he "remained at the hospital only because the regimental surgeon ordered him to do so" played out. My understanding is that surgeon's were not in the chain of command, so he could not have ordered Dobson to do anything.

Andy
PermalinkPermalink 05/08/09 @ 11:15
Comment from: Ken Noe [Visitor] Email
Thanks to both of you, as well as the author of an e-mail I received privately. My initial impression was that class and rank had their privileges. I may still come down that way, but I've also been impressed by how Dobson's fighting record may have bought him something of a "get out of jail" card. I'm reminded of Earl Hess's observation that soldiers would view acts such as running from the enemy as cowardly or not cowardly depending on the circumstances and the overall deportment of the man in question. I also need to find out, if I can, how soldiers-to-be viewed Dobson and Smith before the war.
PermalinkPermalink 05/10/09 @ 10:57
Comment from: Megan Kate Nelson [Visitor] Email
Hi Ken--sorry to be so late to this discussion! I am interested in the role of the mortally wounded soldier here. From many print sources, illustrations, and political cartoons I have seen, there was a debate during the war about who was responsible for and to wounded soldiers on the field of battle and later, in the hospitals. There was certainly a conviction among many soldiers that helping their wounded comrades was an honorable act that showed both their humanity and the dignity of the wounded man. There were others, however, who were convinced that this was all a kind of battlefield "performance." I ran across this assertion in the private letters of Charles Morse, a Boston Brahmin serving with Robert Gould Shaw and others in the 2nd Mass., and thought it might interest you:

Morse to his sister Ellen, from Maryland Heights, September 26/28, 1862: [26th]: “I saw a letter in the Transcript from a solider of the 13th Mass in which he coolly writes that he left the ranks during the fight to carry off a wounded man, and couldn’t find his regiment again therefore staid in the hospital. This is the dodge of all cowards and shirks, to seize hold of the first wounded man, carry him to a hospital and remain there till after the battle. […] I saw one man of the 12th who was slightly wounded in the hand, being assisted off the field by two of his comrades, while four more followed in behind, carrying his arms &c.” (Charles F. Morse Civil War Letters, Charles F. Morse Papers, Box 1, Folder 4, Massachusetts Historical Society)
PermalinkPermalink 05/11/09 @ 05:32
Comment from: Ken Noe [Visitor] Email
Hi Megan: Officers traditionally ordered their men to ignore wounded friends, close up, and keep fighting. Dobson himself argued that he waited at least until the attack had failed before he left his company to tend to Smith, although at this juncture I'm not sure if he did. But there's no doubt that a lot of men saw a wounded comrade as a ticket to the rear, as Morse points out. "Cowardice" is a topic well worth discussion, and I hope that Lesley Gordon's exploration of it continues.
PermalinkPermalink 05/11/09 @ 14:35
Comment from: Ken Noe [Visitor] Email
Readers: For what it's worth, as I move through my research and writing, I have discovered two errors in my abstarct; the founder of the firm was Smith's brother, and Smith's body was only removed to Mississippi the following spring. I'll probably find more as I go!
PermalinkPermalink 05/18/09 @ 14:30
Comment from: Military Degree [Visitor] Email · http://www.educationconnection.com/info/military/military_1.aspx
I found your blog on Google and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.
PermalinkPermalink 12/02/09 @ 21:12
Comment from: Lane [Visitor] Email · http://www.tampalawyerx.com
The class system has always existed in the military and forms of it still exist today. Anyone who has been come up against anyone with a "ring' knows this. I assume that it was nto much different during the Civil War. Even well to do families could "buy out" of combat for handsome sum of $300.
PermalinkPermalink 12/16/09 @ 11:52
Comment from: Online Criminal Justice Degrees [Visitor] Email · http://www.educationconnection.com/info/criminaljustice/default.aspx
Good advice. We often advise our students to take a step back and understand what they are getting into. This article reinforces that concept with some practical advice.
PermalinkPermalink 12/18/09 @ 00:43

This post has 15 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))


February 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            

Weirding the War

A creative discussion for those researching and writing on the American Civil War.

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is this?

powered by b2evolution free blog software